That doesn’t mean skipping question prep. “We still brainstorm questions, don’t get me wrong,” she says. Her team just doesn’t let those questions become the structure of the prep.
Think about the usual exercise. Everyone gets in a room and lists every hard question they might get, with an answer under each one. It feels thorough. But according to Francesca, it trains executives “to be in a reactive mode.”
So about 10 years ago, she stopped using traditional Q&A documents. Here’s what her team builds instead:
- A document organized by topic, not by question (example topics: expiring patents, vaccines, individual brands)
- A short elevator pitch for each topic and brand (e.g., during quarter, what changed, how brands performed)
It’s a living document. Her team builds it between quarters, sharpens it right before earnings, uses it in prep, and then starts again.
As Francesca puts it, “It forces you to really think about your talk points, your proof points, your data points.”
The payoff is that executives are ready for the topic, however the question is phrased.
Her example makes it click. Say an analyst asks for market share (which isn’t something they disclose all the time).
- The Q&A-style answer: “85%.” Done. Next question.
- The story-first answer: Start with the brand (“Let me talk to you about X brand. We’re very pleased with the performance in the quarter….”), and then give the number.
You’re still answering the question. However, you’re providing context that you believe investors need to hear.
Our take: This is the one we’ll be thinking about for a while. And the idea is worth borrowing even if you keep your Q&A doc.
Pull up the questions your executives actually got last quarter (not the hypothetical ones). Which themes keep coming back? Those are your topics. Build a clear and proactive story, with proof points, around each one.