IR Mailbag: IROs Are Asking About Rebuilding Their Story, Investors’ Biggest Doubt, and More

Rethink Your Investor Presentation Before January Hits

If you are planning your IR priorities for next year, there is a window right now to get a head start before conference and roadshow season picks up in January. We have been running what we call an Investor Presentation Diagnostic for IR teams that want to rethink how their investor presentations work.

It is a focused two-to-three-week engagement ($10,000 to $15,000). We review your current investor presentation and deliver an investor presentation outline built on our six-factor framework. It maps your deck chapter by chapter, as slides you can work from. You walk away with a clear direction and a blueprint for the full build, not the build itself.

A few of our current clients started exactly this way. It is also a practical use of remaining 2026 budget, since the work carries directly into next year.

If you want to explore it, book a session below.

Book A Session

We have had a number of conversations with IROs and their leadership teams recently, across different industries and market caps. A few questions kept coming up. Here are three of them, with our honest take.

Q1: “We want to change how investors see us. Should we rebuild our story from scratch?”

Based on a conversation with the CEO of a mid-cap specialty automotive company

Yes. And, we were ready to say that before he even asked.

The IRO’s deck was built around the IPO and had been tweaked over the years, but it was essentially a very detailed product primer. Now, if your company is not well known, you should absolutely talk about your products. That is not the issue. The issue is retail how deep you go, and how you prioritize your messaging. This deck went too deep and too early, and investors don’t need that level of product education. They need enough to understand what you do, and then they need to know why they should own the stock. The latter part was missing: there wasn’t a clear investment thesis or a narrative that would get a portfolio manager to say, “Let me take a meeting.” The financials were buried at the end.

The CEO was candid. He said, “If I do this myself, I will get us right back to where the deck is today.” So, we started from a blank page, and with first principles: What is the investment thesis? What do investors need to believe? What proof do we have?

Where are we now?

We meet with the leadership team weekly, and each conversation is helping us build the deck from scratch versus reproducing from the old deck. The benefit is that it forces you to revisit and pressure-test the investment thesis rather than polish what was already there.  The investor presentation we are building keeps the investor in mind on every slide, and the team is already thinking differently about how they tell the story.

If your deck has been tweaked for years and still feels more like a company overview than an investment case, you are likely better off with a rebuild.

Q2: “Should our story address investors’ biggest doubt head-on, or would that sound defensive?”

An IRO of a mid-cap company navigating a strategic pivot asked this question on an initial call

It depends on the topic, and I do not have a blanket answer. But my general take is: do not avoid it. There are ways to address the elephant in the room without sounding like you are reacting to it.

Here is an example. This company announced it was building a manufacturing facility from scratch. Investors were concerned: you have never done this, why now, is it risky? The framing that worked was not “we are confident we can do this.” It was making the move feel obvious. The company already had quality engineers, R&D teams, and people overseeing production at outsourced facilities. They were deeply involved in manufacturing. The only thing they did not have was the building. And every major competitor already owned theirs. When you lay it out that way, it stops feeling like a risk and starts feeling like a natural next step.

One more idea that we think IR teams underuse: if you have already answered it publicly, use it. If the CEO addressed a concern during an earnings Q&A or at a conference, that answer is now public. Put it in an FAQ section of your investor deck
or your company factsheet for an investor conference. Source it: “As discussed during our Q3 earnings call.” You are not introducing a new concern. You are packaging an answer that already exists. The benefit is that most investors likely have the same question but may not always ask it directly. An FAQ makes it easy for them to understand your nuanced position before the conversation even starts, so when you do meet, they come more informed and ask sharper, more productive questions.

Where are we with this?

In the investor presentation we are building, we are following this approach. The thing investors were concerned about is now framed as part of the company’s margin expansion strategy and competitive advantage. Here is what we are doing, here are the proof points. We also have an FAQ section at the end with answers sourced from what the C-suite has already said publicly. It addresses the doubts without making it feel like a reaction.

Q3: “How do we know if a new investor story is working?”

Based on a conversation with the CFO of a small-cap semiconductor equipment company

There are lots of ways to know if an investor story is working, but here are two of the more important things to watch for.

The first is whether the deck opens doors. A good investor presentation should tease enough interest early on that someone wants to take a meeting, provided there is a high-level fit. It does not need to close the deal. It does not need to answer every question. avoid It just needs to make someone curious enough to ask for a meeting.

The second is avoid the quality of questions you get. If investors are still asking you to explain the basics of your strategy, the story is not landing. When they start asking deeper questions, about the assumptions behind your growth, the competitive dynamics, the details of execution, that means the deck did its job.

It served the key things investors are looking for on a platter, and now they want to go further. That is exactly what a deck should do. It should not try to answer the deepest, most detailed question. That is why investors will always want to talk to you live.

And even self-selection is a win. If an investor looks at your deck and says, “I understand this company, but it is not for me,” that is a good outcome. You are not wasting their time or yours.

One example:

Recently, we rebuilt the investor presentation for a mega-cap company. The new deck started with an at-a-glance slide covering revenue, EBITDA, which segments drive the most profit, and the key products in each. Then it flowed into industry trends and TAM, then competitive advantage, then strategy, then the financial model. The first time they used it with an investor, we got a message from the IRO that the conversation was completely different. It felt like the slides were anticipating the questions before the investor could ask them.

Have a question or a different point of view? Please email us at [email protected] and leave a short note. We would love to hear from you.

Check Out Some of Our Recent IR Presentation Projects

Learn more about OUTKREATE’s Investor Relations Solutions

We help Investor Relations teams to ELEVATE presentations for any occasion – be it your novelty Investor Day, General Overview, Quarterly Earnings, Investor Conferences, ESG Updates.

Thinking of UPGRADING your Investor Materials?
TALK THROUGH YOUR PRESENTATION CHALLENGE

How does your Presentation measure up?

Do you have a major event or a high-stakes meeting coming up? Do you need a sharp narrative and bold design?

Let's connect and we can take a closer look at your presentations. We'll share with you actionable ideas along with real examples that you can apply to improve odds of success.

Book an introductory call